See Wang Xiaofeng, said in his association are not allowed to read a good book, bbc period and looking at the virtual revolution, both sides will have some views mapping.
fact, I soon got the that the original meaning of Translation basically reflects the author's point of view, so the author throughout the book is confusing the two concepts, which is one of the biggest book. of the whole book is the argument of the network's unlimited, flat , leads to a large number of anonymous amateurs went to the network of professional issues recommendations rather than professional dissemination of information so that people would not accept the information in the reproduction and thus more non-professional information, and this information will change the world too confusing. but the authors did not define what constitutes a good amateur, but referred to the Concise Oxford English Dictionary definition, in fact, the network is indeed a huge number of amateurs who made a variety of different views, but we can not whereby said network is dominated by the amateur, but is more often the case put forward various views of experts, led by the involvement of amateurs. And here is an amateur who is not well defined, because the so-called Amateur in the professional life of a person, but a social issue participation. as human brain cells, perhaps a brain cell can handle only a single electrical pulse to distinguish 1 and 0, but when brain cells are composed of organizations have storage, processing the function of a variety of complex information, the network just in this revolution. Each person may not have plenty of information, one thing can not be released to the insightful comments, but when the number exceeds the critical point, will inevitably lead to ideological outbreak. Moreover, Internet users are not just some amateur, I am confident, based on the number of Internet users are not professionals in a university professor than any less, nor more than any university professor has lower professionalism. And, precisely because of the exchange network, in which professional opinion will be echoed by quasi-professionals and complement, thus non-professionals. of the network as a scourge of professional knowledge, while ignoring a large the use of the number of law; the other hand, ignored the expertise of the change in the Internet age, neglect of a person's database and a database difference between communities. In addition, the profession itself as a professional evaluation criteria are not scientific, I believe that the moon next year Customs History of the Civil Service level not lower than any historian, I also believe that graduate students of Chemistry, University of Washington south of the writing level is not lower than the Writers of certain writers. career is but a means to earn a living, some people Fortunately the means of livelihood and personal interests, strengths associated with, but many people do not eat their own expertise. if only to professional or academic classification, then my life will be filled with sorrow, because God will be lost for seven days in Kyushu lost Luo, Tsai riffraff out, lost a lot, or even lose my undergraduate professional mm because there are too many amateur professional color of the birth.
Secondly, with a large number of examples of network you want to explain the harm of human society . But, unfortunately, I do not know the author has not received his professional training of those respected, because a lot of examples and not in the network and the relationship between social harm, that those examples do not prove any causal relationship. In Here, he uses the most simple way is their only reference point for useful examples demonstrate the same case, will bring us some of the adverse consequences. As an example of how the network affects a person's conscience to the election, for example, Vernon. Robinson's campaign video, but he only pointed out how the video was against other people's privacy without a more complete description in the end what people accuse others of this violation of privacy of video. that is of only very simple criticism of the footage of the youtube site, but did not specify in which users play a real role. In fact, even a very tricky way of reference to this example, tried to make people have a more common society, to instill a simple point to rely on people to get the response is quite simply impossible thing, it is strongly opposed to the cyber world of the plane so that any point of view and democratization will be both at the same time support. Youtube might provide a platform for the invasion of privacy, but also for critical voices, the voices provide a platform for protection. Democracy Network, which means that the voice of any person here is equal, the real interest is the Internet users support role in the law of large numbers, we can actually see a normal society can always make the right choice, or is the right choice for the moment. Of course, if the composition of Internet users is in itself unreasonable, they can not use the representation of law of large numbers. For example, Chinese Twitter community, because the information does not flow, or man-made barrier special push in the general population, the Chinese Twitter inbreeding would be very prominent. because most of them have the same point of view, there is no inflow of the outside world thought that they always have from the reality between the resonance. In addition, the author discusses the problem which is another great confusion of the network itself and social problems in the network extension of these two concepts . Some social problems exist in itself, but more prominent by the network, but this can not be attributed to the network itself, should not conclude that the network has brought this problem. and some, indeed, the problem is the network itself, the emergence of the network caused. The latter expression is the variety of the most prominent books on music piracy (which is one of the few I recognized one of the network); the former, as the author cited network that is following the network of human madness just another form shown, there is no inherent irrationality of human networks will be shown in something else, such as a stock such as futures. Leaving aside the kinds of can be said of the network carried away by their own minds hate.
In fact, the idea of such is not surprising, the network brings a huge impact human life, even in just a decade can be said to subvert the people some of the inherent ideology, which have obedience to authority. No matter how in the book of the use of He only expressed a central idea: the world needs the knowledge required and only a small part of the elite from the grasp of ordinary people can do is to accept the knowledge it gives us the elite. Well, let's look at history back through the Reformation On the eve of Europe, standing in front of the church so that we will hear a voice: there was a bit familiar? the advent of printing the Bible in a lot of communication between ordinary people, because the printing press to make it possible to bulk copy the Bible, but also to the spread of the Bible become more accurate and popular. Meanwhile, the other by religious reform resistance is due to the church, such as Martin. Luther. gold and other off the church's way of getting money. They claim to be God's revelation and care do not need the clergy to the church to follow the explanation and induction, only God will be everywhere in my mind God, so we no longer go to church just to buy indulgences at home and prayed. seems not, and Keane's a form of religious revolution, so we worship on the priest from out of the infinite, so that we can start to learn from their own knowledge required in this world, so that we can get at home, rather than divine revelation church. Of course, the clerics bound to step on the tail like a worry.
in human history, every change is a We get rid of his weak body, from our beginning we learn to use the steam out of the limitations of animal power until we learn to learn to use the electricity network of communication throughout the world. religious significance of the revolution and the Internet revolution, is also here, if you can apply the Weber or Internet age, because the network itself is anti-authority, it is from birth to promote the exchange and dissemination of information, from birth to usher in a decentralized process. blinders of Keane and did not see what is the nature of the network, or said he saw the nature of the network to be of the view that unfortunately is a social regression. In fact, in this society, people, or those who study his life. because they can prove they have mastered to some extent more information or data, the first network society, information and data on mean survival and success. But in the Internet age, Since the existence of the network, information and data that everyone can share resources, simply wanted to have more data to convince others is unlikely to be successful. At this time, the authority is no longer to have more data or information, people, but better use of these data or the message. in the United States is known as anti-elitist tradition, this understanding of the most elite of the Supreme Court is very incisive: authority, other political bodies and public opinion, the ultimate support. authority, the authority is a not fixed. If so, it can only be rational.
Postscript: In fact, many say this book is also reasonable, at least I think there are three. First, the time cost. the Internet age the great wealth of information and data to free people from dependence on the authority of, the analysis of raw materials are free and not eat other people's leftovers chewed. but the problem is that the great wealth of raw materials make it impossible under the mouth In search of raw materials consumed during the time that greatly non-renewable resources. but at least the network itself also has filtering mechanisms, a good raw material will gradually settle down. like a man in a thousand books to find the right information is extremely exhausting thing, but at the same time to see a thousand thousand people is another thing the book. Second, intellectual property issues. tell the truth, this is the most painful thing is I can not think of thing. Third, the protection of reason. even though I praise the network to bring convenience to people's lives, and praise it has brought us freedom and independence, but each person only worship of rationality is probably not rational consequences. replaced by a rational God, this thing after another has become God, we can only rely on the heart sure to keep it independent of it.
So, I do not like this book not because it speaks of no reason, nor is it It is radical. but it appears time environment is very unreasonable. in the United States, highly developed social network, the network will inevitably bring about the shortcomings of some reflections aroused, there will be people such as Jean criticize this . But this book is transplanted to China, it was not consistent with the environment now, can you imagine trying to avoid a pre-industrial society, the shortcomings of post-industrial society there? You can, when a person starving, grab the The only burger in his hand, shouting that he shouted resist this book.
2010/5/9
No comments:
Post a Comment